Cjeu cases. What is crucial for the relations between a sovereign state and an inter...

Cjeu cases. What is crucial for the relations between a sovereign state and an international organisation was thus overturned. It has 27 Judges and 11 Advocates General. It covers the Court of Justice (CJ), General Court (GC), and Civil Service Tribunal (CST) for the Court's entire history (1952-2023). On 19 March 2026, Advocate-General Capeta issued an opinion in the case of Elisa Eesti AS v Estonian Government Security Committee (C-354/24). Overview of CJEU judgments and pending cases Overview of judgments and pending cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union on: 6 days ago · On 19 March 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Case C-526/24, Brillen Rottler, clarifying that a data subject’s first request for access to personal data under Article 15 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) may be refused as “excessive”. Yet through the recognition of foreign marriages, both courts have in effect introduced a form of same-sex marital status into the Polish legal order through an alternative . Mar 26, 2019 · The Supreme Court referred this matter to the CJEU to determine whether an adopted child under the Algerian Kafala system falls within the meaning of direct descendant under Directive 2004/38. Neither the CJEU nor the NSA declared that Poland must legalize same-sex marriage domestically. Jun 19, 2018 · However, the CJEU reiterated that the implementation of the Return Directive must respect fundamental rights and legal principles, in particular those enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFEU). Case summary: It contains data on the universe of CJEU cases, proceedings, decisions, judges and more. Apr 1, 2025 · The first quarter of 2025 has brought several key rulings from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) that are shaping GDPR compliance and enforcement. 5 days ago · CJEU rules that first GDPR access requests may be refused as excessive when made in bad faith, offering clarity on handling abusive DSARs. This case concerned, among other things, whether a 2022 order from the Estonian Government for Elisa Eesti AS—a 5G network operator—to remove Huawei components from its network for national security reasons was subject to EU law, constituted a Jul 2, 2020 · The CJEU held that the first sentence of Article 16 (1) of Directive 2008/115 lays down the principle that the detention of illegally staying third-country nationals for removal is to take place in specialised detention facilities. It hears several different types of cases. It also hears appeals against decisions of the General Court. 12 hours ago · In that case, acting beyond its competences, the CJEU held that Poland breached EU law through Constitutional Tribunal rulings that questioned the primacy of EU law and the jurisdiction of the CJEU over Poland’s constitution. The second sentence lays down a derogation from that principle, which must be interpreted strictly. 12 hours ago · This is why the ruling matters far beyond its limited administrative scope. It mostly deals with questions about EU law sent by national courts and cases brought by the Commission against EU Member States for infringing EU law. Here is our first CJEU case round-up of the year. obobe acq uyffy qqw dcvytrh