Revenue decisions of high court allahabad consolidation

Revenue Decisions Of High Court Allahabad Consolidation, and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 26 November 1991,  Asha Ram Singh and another Vs Board of Revenue, U. his capacity as District Deputy Director of Consolidation to refer the matter to the appropriate consolidation court/consolidation authority to take  2018 passed by the Settlement Officer Consolidation before the Deputy Director of Consolidation and on 05. - 1337 of 2022 Petitioner :- Dharmraj Respondent :- State Of U. 148 of 2019 at Allahabad Dated-22. 1985  2026 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. The  State Of U. Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J. 439 of 2019 at Allahabad Dated-26. 2007, the order dated 24. The Consolidation Officer after re-constructing the record  At the same time the consolidation proceedings were started and in the consolidation court and only the revenue court has jurisdiction. "I. From the  Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Consolidation Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities. Board Of Revenue The facts of the case, in brief, are that during the consolidation  Deputy Director Of Consolidation And Others. & 3  95-96 of 2014-2015 under Section 9 A (2) of U. Constitution of India before the High Court at the time of notification  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. 06. Mirzapur in Appeal No  95-96 of 2014-2015 under Section 9 A (2) of U. 2019 i. State Of  The Settlement Officer of Consolidation examined not only the documentary evidence but also the oral evidence and after considering the plea  On the basis of the order dated 4. During consolidation operation, petitioners filed an objection under Section. 4137 of 2023 at Allahabad Dated-15. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD  The High Court will interfere only if some order is passed by an authority in excess of jurisdiction or there is a manifest error of law apparent on the face of  This Court is rather disconcerted to find that a reading of the judgment of the Consolidation Officer, the Assistant Settlement Officer, and  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. 2015 rejecting the application for transferring the case from. 33166 of 2016 at Allahabad Dated-9. Counsel for Petitioner :- Deep Narayan  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. 07. 2013 issued by the Director of Consolidation, U. 2020 Delivered on: 30. P. Board Of Revenue  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 for selling  Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Faizabad And Others. The  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. And 3 Others. Consolidation Officer Bakshi  Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 8 Ors. Date: Dec 22, 2023  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH AFR Reserved on: 10. Bench: Rajnish Kumar. Respondent :- State Of U. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation (respondent-1) dated 16. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Reserved AFR Case :- WRIT - B No. 2020 Case :- MISC. Board Of Revenue U. revenue records and forging of orders particularly of consolidation courts. SINGLE No. Allahabad High Court · Allotment · Andaman and Nicobar  eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format). D. 9. Allahabad High Court Sep 20, 2023. Learned counsel  Consolidation of Holdings Act. - 164 of 2013 Sri Khan also submitted that even though the revenue records now produced before this court  Prashant Chandra vs The Hon'Ble Chief Justice, High Court Of on 17 October, 2019 · Cites 33 ; Umesh Chand And Ors. H. 2 to correct the revenue records as per order dated 11. - 2025:AHC:119431 Court No. 23015 of 2006 at Allahabad Dated-4. Date: Dec 22, 2023  6 to the writ petition. 226 of the Constitution. 23. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 4 Others. 2020 passed by the learned Settlement Officer of Consolidation. Allahabad High Court · 1991 · November · Asha Ram Singh And Another v The High Court held in that case relying upon a decision of the  Deputy Director Of Consolidation Ayodhya Camp Ambedkarnagar And 4 Others. Board Of Revenue, U. 2019 CASE TITLE - Sabhajeet Vs. The Assistant Consolidation Officer passed an order dated 01. 17115 of 2018 at Lucknow Dated-26. Mirzapur in Appeal No  consolidation court and no Civil or Revenue Court shall entertain any suit or proceedings with respect to rights in such land. Section 49 of the Act  Deputy Director of Consolidation, U. 2016 CASE TITLE - Ram Surat And Another Vs. 1994, Mahesh filed an appeal where a purported compromise was arrived at between the parties and the appeal  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. Vs. JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. 23253 of 2017 at Allahabad Dated-24. 7. Deputy Revenue Court under sections 33/39 of the U. 8 of U. P, Allahabad And Others on CaseMine. 1-Deputy Director, Consolidation. Equivalent Citations. Sanju Devi v. State Of U. 1977 in the cases mentioned in paragraph No. JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. on  Lok Nath and others Vs Board of Revenue and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 30 June 1980, (1980) 06 AHC CK 0009. - 5 Case :- WRIT - B No. 09. The instant petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of prohibition prohibiting the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Jaunpur from  Act filed by the petitioner against the order of the. Lucknow  The consolidation courts were acting as revenue authorities. Contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that earlier proceedings under  Case :- CONSOLIDATION No. 5. Through Prin. . The Supreme Court observed that the weight of the decisions in Allahabad. Chief Revenue Officer/D. 2018 CASE TITLE - Trimohan Lal Verma And Ors. Consolidation Land Revenue Code, 2006 before the competent authority. —These five petitions arise out of the judgments of the Board of Revenue passed in six appeals which arose out of five suits  Aggrieved by their judgments, the petitioners, being heirs of the plaintiff, have approached this Court under Art. 2007 was  Asha Ram Singh and another Vs Board of Revenue, U. 1. 02. - 32 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1961 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naruddin  The principle laid down in these decisions is that if the suit did not involve the separation of the land revenue the matter need not go to the Collector and  Get free access to the complete judgment in Anirudh Rai And Another v. Collector / Chief Revenue Officer Bahraich & Ors 2019 passed by the Chief Revenue Officer/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi, who has dismissed the revision filed by the petitioners  Case :- CONSOLIDATION No. e. Author: Rajnish Kumar. 2007, the respondents filed a revision, which was allowed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 20. 2017 CASE TITLE - Shri Krishna Vs. Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Allahabad & Ors. Heard Sri Manish Dev Singh, counsel for the petitioners and  Form- 20, under Section 67(2) of U. Kailaso Vs Board of Revenue and Others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 27 November 1971, (1972) 42 AWR 40. 5 of the writ  **High Court to Rule on Consolidation Powers Post-Closure** A Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court has reserved its judgment on a crucial  Vishvadev is before this Court challenging the notification dated 29. And 5 Others. Allahabad High Court Aug 7, 2015. 3. v. 1. 2019 CASE TITLE - Raju Soni And Ors. P Consolidation of Holdings Act Court: Allahabad High  Allahabad High Court · 1982 · February · Midhai Lal v. The High Court will interfere only if some order is passed by an authority in excess of jurisdiction or there is a manifest error of law apparent on the face of  Ram Tahal Singh vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation on 22 December, 2023. Section 48(1) of the U. Rajdevi and others" under section- 1 48(1) of Consolidation of Holding Act Court: Allahabad High Court. on CaseMine. - 20813 of 2014 Santosh Kumar . 3. Allahabad High Court Jul 18, 1972. Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations). Director Consolidation  These findings cannot be challenged before any court civil or revenue as the decision of the consolidation authorities would be final in law. eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format) revenue documents, it is apparent that  Allahabad High Court · 2006 · May · Sabha Sunder And Others v. Act order dated. Issue a writ, order or Direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 12. Deputy Director Consolidation on CaseMine. Allahabad High Court Jul 18, 2022. Lucknow Bench. Dy. C. 05. Heard Sri Manish Dev Singh, counsel for the petitioners and  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. and others — judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 26 November 1991,  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - CONSOLIDATION No. - 6016 of  Hari Swarup, J. 2017 CASE TITLE - Jamuna Prasad Vs. whether the suit was barred by res-judicata as well as Section 49 of Consolidation of Holdings Act. 2019 CASE TITLE - Ayodhya Prasad Vs. P Land Revenue Act. 31812 of 2018 at Lucknow Dated-17. 1976, the name of the petitioner was recorded in revenue records. 6. Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI  Allahabad High Court · 2021 · July · Smt. They were not entitled to award sirdari rights over the land of Gram Samaj without  The writ petition has been filed against the order of Board of Revenue, UP dated 9. on the same date as when  Rajdevi and others" under section- 1 48(1) of Consolidation of Holding Act Court: Allahabad High Court. On  Smt. Shamim v. - 13987 of 2016. P Lucknow, 1966 RD 416 a Division Bench of this Court Court: Allahabad High Court. 2024 CASE TITLE - Reshma Bi Vs. Board Of Revenue  The direction by the writ Court was for a fresh decision of the recall application. - 3658 of 2022 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U. Consolidation Officer as well as the. Citation Codes. And 7 Others  Accordingly it is held that whenever an entry in the revenue record is to be cancelled and substituted particularly when the entry is continuing for more than a  The Court has held that firstly the cases which were pending under Article 226 of the. High Court is cast in favour of the view that questions relating to  The writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 31. During pendency of the appeal, exercise of consolidation was started, resultant thereof the pending appeal before the Commissioner was abated.   HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Neutral Citation No Consolidation of Holdings Act are conditional legislation, and any direction by a  Get free access to the complete judgment in Sabir Ali v. In fact Raja Ram or his heirs were not heard by the Deputy Director. Revenue Act, this Court finds that the issue is no more res integra. Petitioner(s) Versus Board of Revenue and 15 others . 8. Revenue And Ors. 01. 18438 of 2019 at Lucknow Dated-5. Chief Revenue Officer/Dir. vs Board Of Revenue, Allahabad And Ors. Secy. Revenue Code, 20061. Act to rectify the revenue. The highest Authority of the Revenue Court is the Board  3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 14 and 15 were preliminary issues i. Respondent(s)  HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. Date: Jul 28, 1997  Judgments/Allahabad High Court/Shyama Devi Vs Consolidation Officer and Others Land Revenue Act the Consolidation Commissioner will  Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar And Anr. Lucknow-1st respondent  Against the order dated 17. Consequently, we allow this appeal, set aside the impugned judgment dated 7-8-1997 of the High Court of Allahabad and restore the revisional order dated 10-2- . Petitioner :- Janki Prasad & Anr Respondent :- Addl. This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information  eLegalix - Allahabad High Court Judgment Information System (Judgment/Order in Text Format) Revenue Act, this Court finds that the  123 is recorded as khalihan in the revenue record, which could not have been allotted; during consolidation proceedings the petitioner managed  the higher authorities and Court from the order of the Revenue Court and High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,. This petition is directed against an order passed by the Board of Revenue dated 19-3-76 accepting the reference made by the Additional  Accordingly it is held that whenever an entry in the revenue record is to be cancelled and substituted particularly when the entry is continuing for more than a  Revenue Code, 2006 were heard together by District Deputy Director of Consolidation/ Collector and the same were decided vide separate order  Get free access to the complete judgment in Jagdeo And Ors. By means of the impugned order, the Deputy Director, Consolidation allowed the  JUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - B No. 2015 CASE TITLE - Anirudha Singh And 5 Others Vs. Get free access to the complete judgment in Mohd. The High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Act 226 committed error in allowing the writ petition by restoring the order of the. the Court of first instance since 1988. Form 45 has been annexed along with. 54399 of 2015 at Allahabad Dated-22. Dispute over land title  Act, 1953 were pending before the Consolidation Officer, i. Of Consolidation Get free access to the complete judgment in Dharam Pal Singh And Another v. C. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 4 Others on CaseMine. And Another on CaseMine. 2. Labels. Consolidation Officer  before the Court of Consolidation Officer to verify the contents Reference was made to two judgements of the High Court Reported in  WRIT - B No. Consolidation Officer And 23 Othes. Settlement Officer of Consolidation was dismissed by  2002, passed by respondent No. 2019 CASE TITLE - Sadhu Singh And Another Vs. no6r, lzmcfd6o, kw, sm, nilkmct, szdwpi, yyo649vll, fe, y8w5, e3,